situated thought

SKEPTICISM AND VARIETIES OF TRANSCENDENTAL ARGUMENT (pages 395-411)

Submitted by logos on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 11:36
paper title: 

SKEPTICISM AND VARIETIES OF TRANSCENDENTAL ARGUMENT (pages 395-411)

paper type: 
article
paper author: 

Hamid VAHID

paper author family name: 

VAHID

paper abstract: 

ABSTRACT: Transcendental arguments have been described as disclosing the necessary conditions of the possibility of phenomena as diverse as experience, self-knowledge and language. Although many theorists saw them as powerful means to combat varieties of skepticism, this optimism gradually waned as many such arguments turned out, on examination, to deliver much less than was originally thought. In this paper, I distinguish between two species of transcendental arguments claiming that they do not actually constitute distinct forms of reasoning by showing how they collapse into more familiar inferences. I then turn to the question of their epistemic potentials which I argue to be a function of both their types as well as their targets. Finally, these claims are reinforced by uncovering links between certain recent claims about the efficacy of transcendental arguments and the so-called Moore’s paradox.

paper issue: 
5

Powered by Drupal 6 | web development: Codrin Dinu Vasiliu

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Syndicate content
© 2010 Logos & Episteme | An International Journal of Epistemology. Drupal theme by Kiwi Themes.