epistemic abstemiousness

paper title: 

ON EPISTEMIC ABSTEMIOUSNESS AND DIACHRONIC NORMS: A REPLY TO BUNDY (pages 129-134)

paper type: 
debate
paper author: 

Scott AIKIN, Michael HARBOUR, Jonathan NEUFELD, Robert TALISSE

paper author family name: 

AIKIN, HARBOUR, NEUFELD, TALISSE

paper abstract: 

ABSTRACT: In “On Epistemic Abstemiousness,” Alex Bundy has advanced his criticism of our view that the Principle of Suspension yields serious diachronic irrationality. Here, we defend the diachronic perspective on epistemic norms and clarify how we think the diachronic consequences follow. 

paper issue: 
7
paper title: 

ON EPISTEMIC ABSTEMIOUSNESS: A REPLY TO AIKIN, HARBOUR, NEUFELD, AND TALISSE (pages 619-624)

paper type: 
debate
paper author: 

Alex BUNDY

paper author family name: 

BUNDY

paper abstract: 

ABSTRACT: The principle of suspension says that when you disagree with an epistemic peer about p, you should suspend judgment about p. In “Epistemic Abstainers, Epistemic Martyrs, and Epistemic Converts,” Scott F. Aikin, Michael Harbour, Jonathan Neufeld, and Robert B. Talisse argue against the principle of suspension. In “In Defense of Epistemic Abstemiousness” I presented arguments that their arguments do not succeed, and in “On Epistemic Abstemiousness: A Reply to Bundy” they argue that my arguments are not successful. I here clarify and defend my arguments.

paper issue: 
6

ON EPISTEMIC ABSTEMIOUSNESS: A REPLY TO BUNDY (pages 425-428)

Submitted by logos on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 11:40
paper title: 

ON EPISTEMIC ABSTEMIOUSNESS: A REPLY TO BUNDY (pages 425-428)

paper type: 
debate
paper author: 

Scott F. AIKIN, Michael HARBOUR, Jonathan NEUFELD, Robert B. TALISSE

paper author family name: 

AIKIN, HARBOUR, NEUFELD, TALISSE

paper abstract: 

ABSTRACT: In the previous issue of Logos & Episteme, Alex Bundy defends epistemic abstemiousness and criticizes our tales of epistemic abstention to martyrdom and conversion. Here we will briefly reply to Bundy’s criticisms and then diagnose what we think the trouble is with the going versions of epistemic abstemiousness.

paper issue: 
5

Powered by Drupal 6 | web development: Codrin Dinu Vasiliu

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Syndicate content
© 2010 Logos & Episteme | An International Journal of Epistemology. Drupal theme by Kiwi Themes.