incompatibilism

paper title: 

BAILEY ON INCOMPATIBILISM AND THE “NO PAST OBJECTION” (pages 613-617)

paper type: 
debate
paper author: 

Anthony BRUECKNER, Christopher T. BUFORD

paper author family name: 

BRUECKNER & BUFORD

paper abstract: 

ABSTRACT: In ”Incompatibilism and the Past,” Andrew Bailey engages in a thorough investigation of what he calls the "No Past Objection" to arguments for incompatibilism. This is an objection that stems from the work of Joseph Keim Campbell and that has generated an Interesting literature. Bailey ends by offering his own answer to the No Past Objection by giving his own argument for incompatibilism, an argument that he claims to be immune to the objection. We have some observations to make regarding what we take to be Bailey's answer to the objection (all of whose details are left to the reader – we attempt to fill this lacuna).

paper issue: 
6

Powered by Drupal 6 | web development: Codrin Dinu Vasiliu

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Syndicate content
© 2010 Logos & Episteme | An International Journal of Epistemology. Drupal theme by Kiwi Themes.