oughts

ARE REASONS EVIDENCE OF OUGHTS? (pages 157-164)

Submitted by logos on Wed, 03/28/2012 - 11:48
paper title: 

ARE REASONS EVIDENCE OF OUGHTS? (pages 157-164)

paper type: 
debate
paper author: 

Franck LIHOREAU

paper author family name: 

LIHOREAU

paper abstract: 

ABSTRACT:In a series of recent papers Stephen Kearns and Daniel Star argue that normative reasons to ϕ simply are evidence that one ought to ϕ, and suggest that “evidence” in this context is best understood in standard Bayesian terms. I contest this suggestion.

paper issue: 
7

Powered by Drupal 6 | web development: Codrin Dinu Vasiliu

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Syndicate content
© 2010 Logos & Episteme | An International Journal of Epistemology. Drupal theme by Kiwi Themes.