Richard Foley

FOLEY’S SELF-TRUST AND RELIGIOUS DISAGREEMENT (pages 217–226)

Submitted by logos on Sat, 06/29/2013 - 08:07
paper title: 

FOLEY’S SELF-TRUST AND RELIGIOUS DISAGREEMENT (pages 217–226)

paper type: 
debate
paper author: 

Tomas BOGARDUS

paper author family name: 

BOGARDUS

paper abstract: 

ABSTRACT: In this paper, I’ll look at the implications of Richard Foley’s epistemology for two different kinds of religious disagreement. First, there are those occasions on which a stranger testifies to me that she holds disagreeing religious beliefs. Typically, I’m dismissive of such religious disagreement, and I bet you are too. Richard Foley gives reasons to think that we need not be at all conciliatory in the face of stranger disagreement, but I’ll explain why his reasons are insufficient. After that, I’ll look at those types of religious disagreement that occur between epistemic peers . Foley has argued for a conciliatory position. I worry that his position leads to what some in the literature have called “spinelessness.” I also worry that his view is self-defeating, and vulnerable to some apparent counterexamples. I’ll end the paper by sketching my own, non-Foleyan, solution to those problems.

paper issue: 
12

Powered by Drupal 6 | web development: Codrin Dinu Vasiliu

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Syndicate content
© 2010 Logos & Episteme | An International Journal of Epistemology. Drupal theme by Kiwi Themes.